Velocimetrics and Napatech Team Up to Slash Trading Delays

Resolving issues with delayed market data from exchanges helped one investment firm reduce tick-to-trade latency by a factor of 10.

cutting-data-latency

Velocimetrics is partnering with Napatech to reduce tick-to-trade latency by addressing data and internal system issues.

Paul Spencer, COO of Velocimetrics, says firms that use its software—designed to monitor high volumes of messages delivered at a rapid pace during trading transactions—frequently encounter problems with market data delivery. The real-time performance analytics provider is able to reconstruct the trading lifecycle in real-time when data ticks, price and quotes, and a trade order has taken place on a trading venue. 

paul-spencer-velocimetrics
Paul Spencer, Velocimetrics

“We inform traders about how well their platforms are behaving, and therefore how competitive, from a financial perspective, their trading is,” he says. “In the event that trading platforms don’t perform well, it’s almost certain to develop into poor trading performance, financial losses, and so on, which is why it’s so important for a trading organization to depend on their trading for revenue streams. We provide a real-time view of the performance of their platforms.”

Napatech solutions have been integrated into Velcometrics’ software to enable the more accurate reconstruction of trades through the use of its capture technology, which is designed to prevent the loss of packets even during large network loads. 

The complexity of trading technology means custom hardware can make it difficult to locate where problems are occurring in the system. For traders, speed is paramount, so anything that can increase latency could prove costly to firms. Velocimetrics helps trading desks locate problems and allows them to investigate why they are happening in order to reconfigure internal systems and algorithms if necessary.

Daniel Joseph Barry, vice president of strategy and market development at Napatech, says one of the difficulties of using vendors’ technology is server problems. For instance, network cards from a standard server are not built to analyze data at high speeds, he says, so when information is being passed at 20 gigabytes, packets will be lost and none of the target technology timestamps this information. 

“If you try and take a standard Intel network interface card and use it for prime-time applications, what you find when the number of packets goes up is that you start to lose the packet, then you start to lose the data,” he says.

Napatech provides high-stability clocks for timestamping, which was the primary reason the technology was chosen, according to Spencer. Timestamping the data allows for accurate latency measurements that are conducted at nanosecond speeds.

“With precise timestamping, the technology would then be able to map that in the infrastructure in the trading environment, allowing the client to go in and analyze what is happening at a very granular level,” says Barry. “The key thing for one firm was that they were experiencing this end-to-end hundred microsecond delay, but they just didn’t know where the source of this delay was, and by providing very granular visibility and very precise timing, they were able to go in and fix it.”

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi

Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.

Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?

The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here